CS1.L vs. XMBR.L
CS1.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)) and XMBR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CS1.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while XMBR.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CS1.L returned 12.20%/yr vs 6.58%/yr for XMBR.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CS1.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XMBR.L.
Performance
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CS1.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than XMBR.L's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CS1.L has outperformed XMBR.L with an annualized return of 12.20%, while XMBR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.58% annualized return.
CS1.L
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 40.31%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
XMBR.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 37.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 10.61% | 62.63% | 14.12% | 24.14% | 4.89% | 0.59% | -7.48% | 8.06% | -11.27% | 15.93% |
XMBR.L Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C | 13.69% | 38.26% | -28.61% | 25.42% | 25.85% | -17.12% | -21.96% | 20.39% | 4.70% | 12.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CS1.L and XMBR.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2008 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CS1.L and XMBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (5 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Utilities
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Industrials
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Consumer Cyclical
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Technology
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Real Estate
CS1.L
XMBR.L
-
Energy
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Communication Services
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Basic Materials
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Healthcare
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Consumer Defensive
CS1.L
XMBR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
CS1.L
XMBR.L
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CS1.L | XMBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.30 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 2.05 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.05 | 5.46 | +7.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CS1.L drawdown since its inception was -57.96%, smaller than the maximum XMBR.L drawdown of -84.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS1.L and XMBR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CS1.L | XMBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.96% | -84.29% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -17.94% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | -40.25% | +27.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -40.25% | +22.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | -53.50% | +14.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -41.59% | +38.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -57.96% | +40.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 6.76% | -3.68% |
Volatility
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) is 4.42%, while Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that CS1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CS1.L | XMBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.49% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 16.28% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 21.30% | -4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 29.36% | -10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 32.64% | -13.35% |
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CS1.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMBR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CS1.L vs. XMBR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CS1.L nor XMBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CS1.L and XMBR.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CS1.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CS1.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMBR.L.
CS1.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XMBR.L is Latin America Equities. CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while XMBR.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CS1.L and 0.65% for XMBR.L.
Find the right allocation for CS1.L and XMBR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer