CS1.L vs. MMS.L
CS1.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - CS1.L tracks the BME IBEX 35 NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. CS1.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CS1.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CS1.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 37.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 6.29% | 62.63% | 15.22% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CS1.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
CS1.L
MMS.L
Utilities
CS1.L
MMS.L
Industrials
CS1.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
CS1.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
CS1.L
MMS.L
Technology
CS1.L
MMS.L
Energy
CS1.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
CS1.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
CS1.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
CS1.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
CS1.L
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CS1.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CS1.L
MMS.L
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CS1.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CS1.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CS1.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CS1.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | — | — |
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CS1.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CS1.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CS1.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CS1.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CS1.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for CS1.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer