PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CS1.L vs. MMS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CS1.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


CS1.L

1D
0.91%
1M
3.97%
YTD
6.29%
6M
10.00%
1Y
37.36%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
19.41%
10Y*
12.13%

MMS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)
6.29%62.63%15.22%
MMS.L
Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CS1.L
MMS.L

Financial Services

40.3%
16.9%

Utilities

19.0%
3.4%

Industrials

15.8%
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.9%

Real Estate

3.3%
12.8%

Technology

3.2%
10.3%

Energy

2.8%
5.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.0%

Basic Materials

1.3%
5.9%

Healthcare

0.7%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
1.7%

Financial Services

CS1.L
40.3%
MMS.L
16.9%

Utilities

CS1.L
19.0%
MMS.L
3.4%

Industrials

CS1.L
15.8%
MMS.L
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CS1.L
10.8%
MMS.L
10.9%

Real Estate

CS1.L
3.3%
MMS.L
12.8%

Technology

CS1.L
3.2%
MMS.L
10.3%

Energy

CS1.L
2.8%
MMS.L
5.6%

Communication Services

CS1.L
2.4%
MMS.L
3.0%

Basic Materials

CS1.L
1.3%
MMS.L
5.9%

Healthcare

CS1.L
0.7%
MMS.L
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

CS1.L
0.3%
MMS.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CS1.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CS1.L
CS1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CS1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CS1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MMS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CS1.LMMS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CS1.LMMS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

Drawdowns

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CS1.LMMS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

Volatility

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CS1.LMMS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CS1.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CS1.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CS1.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CS1.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CS1.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.

CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CS1.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CS1.L and MMS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer