PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRXP vs. RESM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRXP vs. RESM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRXP achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than RESM's 21.45% return.


CRXP

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.27%
6M
0.19%
YTD
0.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RESM

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.43%
6M
16.82%
YTD
21.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRXP vs. RESM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRXP
Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF
0.72%-0.22%
RESM
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF
21.45%-3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CRXP and RESM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRXP vs. RESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRXP vs. RESM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRXP vs. RESM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRXP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum RESM drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRXP and RESM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRXPRESMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-8.50%

+5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-1.13%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-1.74%

+0.78%

Volatility

CRXP vs. RESM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRXPRESMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

17.21%

-13.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.81%

17.21%

-13.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

17.21%

-13.40%

CRXP vs. RESM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRXP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than RESM's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRXP vs. RESM - Dividend Comparison

CRXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than RESM's 0.08% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRXP and RESM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRXP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRXP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for RESM.

CRXP has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.08% for RESM.

CRXP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while RESM is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for CRXP and 0.32% for RESM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRXP and RESM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer