CRXP vs. EUSB
CRXP (Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. CRXP is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRXP charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
CRXP vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRXP achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.28% return.
CRXP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
CRXP vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.91% | -0.22% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.28% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRXP and EUSB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRXP vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
CRXP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EUSB
CRXP vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRXP | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRXP vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRXP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRXP and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRXP | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -17.87% | +15.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -1.22% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -6.45% | +5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility
CRXP vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRXP | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 3.50% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 5.78% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 5.40% | -1.56% |
CRXP vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRXP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CRXP vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
CRXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than EUSB's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.08% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRXP and EUSB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for CRXP.
EUSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 2.08% for CRXP.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for CRXP and 0.12% for EUSB.
Find the right allocation for CRXP and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer