CRWU vs. TSLZ
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
CRWU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly higher than TSLZ's -3.24% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- 48.91%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- 1Y
- -65.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 48.91% | -76.87% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -3.24% | -61.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and TSLZ is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
TSLZ
CRWU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | -0.67 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -99.11% | +9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | -98.98% | +21.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -75.39% | +9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.77% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.93% | 91.68% | +100.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 116.96% | +74.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 116.96% | +74.97% |
CRWU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than TSLZ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 5.71% | 8.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.71% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.71% for TSLZ.
CRWU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 1.05% for TSLZ.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer