CRWU vs. TSLG
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.
Performance
CRWU vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -33.05% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -14.55%
- 1M
- -51.22%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 6M
- -23.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLG
- 1D
- -13.33%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -33.05%
- 6M
- -35.69%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 27.24% | -76.87% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -33.05% | 76.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and TSLG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
TSLG
CRWU vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | -0.40 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than TSLG's maximum drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and TSLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -82.86% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.00% | -66.18% | -14.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -58.75% | -6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.25% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 192.15% | 93.25% | +98.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.15% | 115.55% | +76.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.15% | 115.55% | +76.60% |
CRWU vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than TSLG's 9.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 6.69% | 8.51% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 9.78% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and TSLG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.78%, compared with 6.69% for CRWU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for TSLG.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and TSLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer