CRWU vs. MSTU
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.
Performance
CRWU vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -52.47% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- 48.91%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -55.32%
- YTD
- -52.47%
- 6M
- -69.89%
- 1Y
- -94.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 48.91% | -76.87% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -52.47% | -90.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and MSTU is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
MSTU
CRWU vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | -0.40 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and MSTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -98.58% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -96.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | -98.46% | +20.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -72.00% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 75.41% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 39.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 111.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.93% | 138.43% | +53.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 168.89% | +23.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 168.89% | +23.04% |
CRWU vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 5.71% | 8.51% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and MSTU have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 1.05% for MSTU.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and MSTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer