CRWU vs. COIG
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.
Performance
CRWU vs. COIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -67.38% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -14.55%
- 1M
- -51.22%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 6M
- -23.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG
- 1D
- -14.29%
- 1M
- -44.01%
- YTD
- -67.38%
- 6M
- -77.55%
- 1Y
- -80.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 27.24% | -76.87% |
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -67.38% | -74.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and COIG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
COIG
CRWU vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | -0.43 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, roughly equal to the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and COIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -92.67% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -92.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.00% | -92.67% | +11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -51.96% | -13.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 66.38% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 39.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 100.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 192.15% | 139.64% | +52.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.15% | 146.55% | +45.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.15% | 146.55% | +45.60% |
CRWU vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, while COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 6.69% | 8.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and COIG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for COIG.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and COIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer