CRWD vs. FTS.TO
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) and FTS.TO (Fortis Inc.) are both stocks. CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while FTS.TO operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 24.18%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for FTS.TO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRWD is traded in USD, while FTS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FTS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 45.66% return, which is significantly higher than FTS.TO's 11.17% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 14.93%
- YTD
- 45.66%
- 6M
- 35.27%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 64.60%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FTS.TO
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 22.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 45.66% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 11.17% | 29.86% | 5.32% | 7.31% | -13.36% | 21.87% | 2.47% | 8.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and FTS.TO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | -0.06 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CRWD and FTS.TO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Fundamentals
CRWD:
$176.08B
FTS.TO:
CA$40.48B
CRWD:
-$0.02
FTS.TO:
CA$3.56
CRWD:
34.09
FTS.TO:
3.30
CRWD:
38.00
FTS.TO:
1.78
CRWD:
$5.09B
FTS.TO:
CA$12.21B
CRWD:
$3.82B
FTS.TO:
CA$3.98B
CRWD:
$246.78M
FTS.TO:
CA$5.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
FTS.TO
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWD | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.90 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 9.53 | -6.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than FTS.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and FTS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -41.25% | -26.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -6.05% | -31.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -14.45% | -29.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | -30.19% | -37.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -2.00% | -10.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -8.48% | -15.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.29% | 2.47% | +13.82% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 18.47% compared to Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) at 4.91%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.47% | 4.91% | +13.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.66% | 10.85% | +26.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.48% | 13.52% | +31.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.78% | 15.81% | +34.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.07% | 17.93% | +38.14% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 3.18% | 3.48% | 3.99% | 4.19% | 4.01% | 3.36% | 3.73% | 3.39% | 3.79% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.73% |
Financials
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Fortis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRWD vs. FTS.TO - Profitability Comparison
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
FTS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a gross profit of 933.00M and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
FTS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported an operating income of 933.00M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
FTS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a net income of 523.00M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and FTS.TO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and FTS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer