CRWD vs. ENVA
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) and ENVA (Enova International, Inc.) are both stocks. CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while ENVA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 24.18%/yr vs 39.68%/yr for ENVA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWD vs. ENVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 45.66% return, which is significantly higher than ENVA's 20.44% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 17.73%
- YTD
- 45.66%
- 6M
- 35.27%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 64.60%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- —
ENVA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 13.51%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 16.35%
- 1Y
- 102.88%
- 3Y*
- 53.36%
- 5Y*
- 39.68%
- 10Y*
- 38.77%
CRWD vs. ENVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 45.66% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 20.44% | 63.95% | 73.19% | 44.28% | -6.32% | 65.36% | 2.95% | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and ENVA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CRWD and ENVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRWD:
$176.08B
ENVA:
$4.99B
CRWD:
-$0.02
ENVA:
$12.29
CRWD:
34.09
ENVA:
1.53
CRWD:
38.00
ENVA:
3.56
CRWD:
$5.09B
ENVA:
$3.28B
CRWD:
$3.82B
ENVA:
$1.23B
CRWD:
$246.78M
ENVA:
$456.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. ENVA — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
ENVA
CRWD vs. ENVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWD | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 4.04 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 10.44 | -7.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. ENVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum ENVA drawdown of -84.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and ENVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -84.26% | +16.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -24.75% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -37.01% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | -42.84% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -0.14% | -12.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -31.82% | +8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.29% | 9.57% | +6.72% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. ENVA - Volatility Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 18.47% compared to Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) at 11.26%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.47% | 11.26% | +7.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.66% | 28.77% | +8.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.48% | 38.58% | +6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.78% | 40.33% | +10.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.07% | 49.25% | +6.82% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. ENVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWD nor ENVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRWD vs. ENVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Enova International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRWD vs. ENVA - Profitability Comparison
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
ENVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 875.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
ENVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.11M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
ENVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 91.10M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and ENVA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (18.47%) compared to ENVA (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs ENVA's -84.26%.
ENVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and ENVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer