CRTC vs. SNPD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) and SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRTC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index, while SNPD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CRTC returned 23.78% vs 13.67% for SNPD. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRTC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SNPD.

Performance

CRTC vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTC achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly higher than SNPD's 8.10% return.

CRTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNPD

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 8.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTC vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	8.59%	18.69%	18.05%	7.18%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.10%	6.66%	5.41%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CRTC and SNPD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.50

The correlation between CRTC and SNPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CRTC vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRTC	SNPD
Technology	33.5%	6.3%
Communication Services	16.0%	3.4%
Healthcare	14.1%	4.9%
Industrials	14.1%	17.5%
Energy	7.1%	3.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	8.7%
Utilities	6.0%	14.4%
Basic Materials	2.6%	7.1%
Financial Services	0.2%	8.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	18.7%

Return for Risk

CRTC vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 33
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTC vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRTC	SNPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.24	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	1.88	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.21	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.58	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	4.72	+5.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRTC vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTC and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRTC	SNPD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.24	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.57	+0.79

Drawdowns

CRTC vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and SNPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTC	SNPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-15.80%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-8.68%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-3.20%	+1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-3.94%	+1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.90%	-0.49%

Volatility

CRTC vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) at 2.75%. This indicates that CRTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTC	SNPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	2.75%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	8.04%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	11.05%	+1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	13.14%	+2.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	13.14%	+2.59%

CRTC vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRTC vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than SNPD's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.00%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.01%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRTC and SNPD in my portfolio?

CRTC and SNPD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRTC or SNPD?

CRTC has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to SNPD (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRTC dropped -19.07% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

Which ETF is better, CRTC or SNPD?

On 1-year performance, CRTC leads with 23.78% vs 13.67% for SNPD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRTC or SNPD?

Over the 1-year period, CRTC has performed better with a 23.78% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRTC or SNPD?

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CRTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRTC or SNPD?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.00% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between CRTC and SNPD?

CRTC is categorized as Technology Equities, while SNPD is Mid Cap Value Equities. CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CRTC and 0.15% for SNPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.