CRTC vs. RSPT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) and RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index while RSPT tracks the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CRTC returned 14.33% vs 46.40% for RSPT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRTC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPT.

Performance

CRTC vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTC achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than RSPT's 31.56% return.

CRTC

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 4.46%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 1Y: 14.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPT

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -5.20%
• 6M: 26.95%
• YTD: 31.56%
• 1Y: 46.40%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 16.47%
• 10Y*: 20.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTC vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	6.66%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	31.56%	22.15%	15.16%	10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CRTC and RSPT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.85

The correlation between CRTC and RSPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRTC vs. RSPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRTC	RSPT
Technology	39.5%	97.9%
Communication Services	15.0%	-
Healthcare	12.7%	-
Industrials	12.6%	0.8%
Energy	6.0%	1.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	-
Utilities	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	0.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

CRTC vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 36
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 41

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 74
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTC vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRTC	RSPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.89	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.42	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.30	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	4.07	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.22	11.90	-6.68

CRTC vs. RSPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the RSPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTC and RSPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRTC vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum RSPT drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and RSPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTC	RSPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-58.91%	+39.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-11.47%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-11.36%	+8.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-8.89%	+6.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.91%	-1.16%

Volatility

CRTC vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) is 3.67%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that CRTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTC	RSPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	8.83%	-5.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	20.68%	-10.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.63%	24.64%	-11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.79%	24.70%	-8.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.79%	23.97%	-8.18%

CRTC vs. RSPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPT's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRTC vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison

CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than RSPT's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.89%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.27%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRTC and RSPT in my portfolio?

CRTC and RSPT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRTC or RSPT?

RSPT has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to CRTC (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRTC dropped -19.07% vs RSPT's -58.91%.

Which ETF is better, CRTC or RSPT?

On 1-year performance, RSPT leads with 46.40% vs 14.33% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRTC or RSPT?

Over the 1-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 46.40% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRTC or RSPT?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRTC or RSPT?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.27% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between CRTC and RSPT?

CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index, while RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CRTC and 0.40% for RSPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.