CRTC vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CRTC returned 14.85% vs 11.58% for KROP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRTC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

CRTC vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTC achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 14.73% return.

CRTC

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 14.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: -0.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTC vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	3.75%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	14.73%	7.95%	-8.74%	4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CRTC and KROP is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.38

CRTC vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRTC	KROP
Technology	39.5%	-
Communication Services	15.0%	-
Healthcare	12.7%	0.3%
Industrials	12.6%	40.4%
Energy	6.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	0.3%
Utilities	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	32.0%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	27.1%

Return for Risk

CRTC vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 33
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 39

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 22
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 21
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTC vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRTC	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	0.72	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	1.12	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.14	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	1.03	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	2.21	+3.42

CRTC vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTC and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRTC vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTC	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-62.08%	+43.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-11.29%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	-49.90%	+44.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-44.72%	+42.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	5.26%	-2.62%

Volatility

CRTC vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 5.01%. This indicates that CRTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTC	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	5.01%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.60%	12.62%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	16.27%	-2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	22.24%	-6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.87%	22.24%	-6.37%

CRTC vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRTC vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than KROP's 2.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.91%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.38%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRTC and KROP in my portfolio?

CRTC and KROP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRTC or KROP?

CRTC has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to KROP (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRTC dropped -19.07% vs KROP's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, CRTC or KROP?

On 1-year performance, CRTC leads with 14.85% vs 11.58% for KROP. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRTC or KROP?

Over the 1-year period, CRTC has performed better with a 14.85% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRTC or KROP?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRTC or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.91% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between CRTC and KROP?

CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CRTC and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.