CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
CRT-UN.TO (CT Real Estate Investment Trust) is a stock, while JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Over the past year, CRT-UN.TO returned 17.13% vs 31.50% for JEPQ.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CRT-UN.TO having a 11.28% return and JEPQ.TO slightly lower at 11.05%.
CRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 11.28% | 20.98% | -9.24% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 11.05% | 10.46% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRT-UN.TO
JEPQ.TO
CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRT-UN.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.09 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 16.35 | -9.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.52 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.34 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.88%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT-UN.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRT-UN.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.88% | -20.05% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -7.74% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.43% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -3.35% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 1.93% | +0.45% |
Volatility
CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) is 2.86%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that CRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 4.05% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 9.87% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 12.58% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 17.32% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 17.32% | +2.93% |
Dividends
CRT-UN.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.36% | 5.77% | 6.40% | 6.04% | 5.48% | 4.76% | 5.09% | 4.70% | 6.37% | 4.82% | 4.57% | 5.09% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 10.00% | 10.34% | 5.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRT-UN.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRT-UN.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer