PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT-UN.TO achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 30.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CRT-UN.TO has underperformed ENCC.TO with an annualized return of 7.40%, while ENCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.38% annualized return.


CRT-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.71%
YTD
11.28%
6M
14.21%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.40%

ENCC.TO

1D
0.77%
1M
3.00%
YTD
30.00%
6M
26.45%
1Y
44.04%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
11.28%20.98%3.91%-0.26%-5.16%16.13%2.73%47.58%-15.83%1.42%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
30.00%13.13%17.39%5.72%41.33%80.55%-27.98%6.54%-31.00%-18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.17

The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRT-UN.TOENCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.56

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

5.22

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

18.57

-11.36

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT-UN.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRT-UN.TOENCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

3.16

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.11

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.29

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.00

+0.54

Drawdowns

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.88%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT-UN.TO and ENCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRT-UN.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.88%

-89.91%

+44.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-8.48%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-16.67%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

-25.57%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

-82.16%

+36.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.24%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-39.81%

+33.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.38%

0.00%

Volatility

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) is 2.86%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that CRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRT-UN.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

5.70%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

12.31%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

14.05%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

23.03%

-5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

29.04%

-8.79%

Dividends

CRT-UN.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
5.36%5.77%6.40%6.04%5.48%4.76%5.09%4.70%6.37%4.82%4.57%5.09%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
11.01%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.09%8.35%6.92%4.77%15.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRT-UN.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRT-UN.TO and ENCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer