CRSOX vs. DCMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX).
CRSOX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Dec 29, 2004. DCMSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 8, 2010.
Performance
CRSOX vs. DCMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRSOX vs. DCMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSOX Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund | 22.21% | 15.66% | 5.21% | -8.88% | 16.40% | 28.99% | -1.12% | 6.99% | -11.65% | 1.75% |
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio | 25.97% | 15.15% | 5.90% | -9.14% | 11.36% | 33.54% | -1.78% | 7.96% | -11.22% | 2.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSOX achieves a 22.21% return, which is significantly lower than DCMSX's 25.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CRSOX having a 8.13% annualized return and DCMSX not far ahead at 8.45%.
CRSOX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 9.72%
- YTD
- 22.21%
- 6M
- 29.28%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
DCMSX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 9.69%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 32.29%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRSOX vs. DCMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSOX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMSX's 0.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRSOX vs. DCMSX — Risk / Return Rank
CRSOX
DCMSX
CRSOX vs. DCMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSOX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.10 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.71 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.77 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 10.61 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSOX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.10 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.10 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSOX and DCMSX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CRSOX vs. DCMSX - Dividend Comparison
CRSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than DCMSX's 8.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSOX Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund | 6.55% | 4.78% | 3.39% | 3.38% | 16.50% | 39.76% | 0.14% | 1.20% | 1.12% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio | 8.36% | 10.75% | 2.83% | 2.52% | 7.46% | 49.44% | 0.37% | 1.51% | 1.63% | 3.09% | 0.47% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
CRSOX vs. DCMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSOX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, which is greater than DCMSX's maximum drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSOX and DCMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSOX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.26% | -60.94% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -9.24% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -27.93% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.89% | -32.52% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.15% | -0.21% | -30.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.28% | -32.13% | -13.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.28% | +0.05% |
Volatility
CRSOX vs. DCMSX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) at 6.55%. This indicates that CRSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRSOX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 6.55% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 13.13% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 16.48% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 16.17% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 14.44% | -0.15% |