PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRSOX vs. CSQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSOX achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than CSQAX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CRSOX has outperformed CSQAX with an annualized return of 6.15%, while CSQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.07% annualized return.


CRSOX

1D
-1.69%
1M
-10.46%
YTD
13.37%
6M
11.79%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
6.15%

CSQAX

1D
-0.70%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
0.95%
6M
0.47%
1Y
0.85%
3Y*
3.01%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
3.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
13.37%15.66%5.21%-8.88%16.40%28.99%-1.12%6.99%-11.65%1.75%
CSQAX
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares
0.95%0.73%0.66%1.72%5.52%9.98%6.10%2.88%-4.31%4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSOX and CSQAX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRSOX vs. CSQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSOX
CRSOX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CRSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CSQAX
CSQAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CSQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CSQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRSOXCSQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.01

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

0.05

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

0.13

+7.26

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the CSQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSOX and CSQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSOX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, which is greater than CSQAX's maximum drawdown of -8.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSOX and CSQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSOXCSQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.26%

-8.37%

-65.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-4.92%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-5.27%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-7.28%

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

-8.37%

-23.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.13%

-4.69%

-31.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.10%

-2.07%

-43.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.12%

+1.07%

Volatility

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) at 2.94%. This indicates that CRSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRSOXCSQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.94%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

6.11%

+8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

7.73%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

6.42%

+9.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

6.09%

+8.24%

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSOX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQAX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRSOX vs. CSQAX - Dividend Comparison

CRSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than CSQAX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
7.06%4.78%3.39%3.38%16.50%39.76%0.14%1.20%1.12%2.75%0.00%0.00%
CSQAX
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares
1.08%1.09%6.54%2.73%2.59%9.06%13.23%4.77%1.84%5.27%1.87%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRSOX and CSQAX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRSOX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to CSQAX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSOX dropped -74.26% vs CSQAX's -8.37%.

CRSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRSOX and CSQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer