PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRSH vs. QYLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRSH vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRSH vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


CRSH

1D
-1.76%
1M
6.01%
YTD
18.37%
6M
24.09%
1Y
-24.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRSH vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRSH vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRSHQYLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

CRSH vs. QYLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRSHQYLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

Dividends

CRSH vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.61%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

CRSH vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and QYLE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSHQYLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

0.00%

-63.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.43%

0.00%

-53.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.91%

0.00%

-41.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.23%

Volatility

CRSH vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRSHQYLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.40%

0.00%

+42.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.37%

0.00%

+48.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.37%

0.00%

+48.37%