CRRFY vs. 0151.HK

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CRRFY (Carrefour SA PK) and 0151.HK (Want Want China) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — CRRFY in Grocery Stores, 0151.HK in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, CRRFY returned 1.22%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for 0151.HK. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carrefour SA PK (CRRFY) and Want Want China (0151.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CRRFY is traded in USD, while 0151.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0151.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRRFY achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly higher than 0151.HK's -27.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CRRFY has outperformed 0151.HK with an annualized return of 1.22%, while 0151.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 0.26% annualized return.

CRRFY

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: 18.58%
• YTD: 18.58%
• 1Y: 36.57%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: 1.22%
• ALL TIME*: -0.23%

0151.HK

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 4.34%
• 6M: -28.65%
• YTD: -27.71%
• 1Y: -38.03%
• 3Y*: -11.71%
• 5Y*: -4.20%
• 10Y*: 0.26%
• ALL TIME*: 4.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
0151.HK Want Want China	$7.25M	$6.67M	$5.56M
CRRFY Carrefour SA PK	$883.02K	$855.87K	$1.21M

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRRFY Carrefour SA PK	18.58%	29.63%	-21.35%	16.51%	-7.14%	9.81%	5.85%	1.86%	-21.15%	-7.58%
0151.HK Want Want China	-27.71%	4.55%	2.69%	-6.73%	-20.70%	30.95%	-17.91%	39.55%	-13.72%	34.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CRRFY and 0151.HK is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2008	0.06

Return for Risk

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRRFY

CRRFY Risk / Return Rank: 85
CRRFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CRRFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CRRFY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CRRFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CRRFY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

0151.HK

0151.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
0151.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
0151.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
0151.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
0151.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
0151.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carrefour SA PK (CRRFY) and Want Want China (0151.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRRFY	0151.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	-1.39	+2.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	-1.90	+3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.75	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	-0.83	+4.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	-1.69	+10.91

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRRFY Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the 0151.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRRFY and 0151.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRRFY drawdown since its inception was -66.95%, which is greater than 0151.HK's maximum drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRRFY and 0151.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRRFY	0151.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.95%	-62.43%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-47.22%	+36.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.65%	-47.22%	+13.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.25%	-53.99%	+16.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.21%	-53.99%	+7.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.66%	-59.03%	+23.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.72%	-31.63%	-9.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	22.93%	-18.85%

Volatility

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK - Volatility Comparison

Carrefour SA PK (CRRFY) and Want Want China (0151.HK) have volatilities of 8.08% and 7.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRRFY	0151.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.08%	7.87%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.89%	23.33%	-2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.40%	28.43%	-4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.36%	28.19%	-1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.51%	29.11%	-1.60%

Dividends

CRRFY vs. 0151.HK - Dividend Comparison

CRRFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than 0151.HK's 4.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0151.HK Want Want China	4.71%	3.43%	5.64%	3.49%	9.28%	2.49%	5.76%	3.80%	3.83%	2.56%	2.86%	2.44%
CRRFY Carrefour SA PK	7.48%	7.23%	6.73%	3.24%	3.35%	3.20%	1.46%	3.17%	3.27%	3.62%	5.33%	2.62%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRRFY and 0151.HK in my portfolio?

CRRFY and 0151.HK have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.