PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (CRPX.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CRPX.L is traded in GBp, while XZE5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XZE5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


CRPX.L

1D
0.24%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
1.71%

XZE5.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRPX.L
Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc
-0.58%8.33%-0.65%4.98%-8.55%-7.58%1.29%
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
-0.42%8.64%-0.59%3.12%-1.52%-6.82%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CRPX.L and XZE5.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.91

The correlation between CRPX.L and XZE5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPX.L
CRPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CRPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CRPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XZE5.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (CRPX.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRPX.LXZE5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRPX.LXZE5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

Drawdowns

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRPX.LXZE5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

Volatility

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRPX.LXZE5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRPX.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XZE5.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CRPX.L vs. XZE5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRPX.L nor XZE5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CRPX.L and XZE5.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRPX.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRPX.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZE5.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CRPX.L and 0.16% for XZE5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRPX.L and XZE5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer