CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L
CRPA.L (iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CLIM.L (Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Global Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CRPA.L returned 0.07%/yr vs -2.60%/yr for CLIM.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRPA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CLIM.L.
Performance
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRPA.L is traded in USD, while CLIM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CLIM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRPA.L achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than CLIM.L's -1.01% return.
CRPA.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CLIM.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- -2.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPA.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.14% | 9.97% | 1.12% | 9.38% | -16.34% | -3.65% | 10.07% | 11.53% | -0.89% |
CLIM.L Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | -1.01% | 12.99% | -3.04% | 10.28% | -22.80% | -9.24% | 12.25% | 7.71% | -2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRPA.L and CLIM.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CRPA.L and CLIM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L — Risk / Return Rank
CRPA.L
CLIM.L
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) and Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRPA.L | CLIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 0.40 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 1.13 | +2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRPA.L | CLIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.32 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | -0.28 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.08 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRPA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.34%, smaller than the maximum CLIM.L drawdown of -36.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPA.L and CLIM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRPA.L | CLIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.34% | -36.82% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -6.12% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.08% | -8.66% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -34.21% | +9.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -16.51% | +14.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -12.85% | +5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 2.16% | -1.00% |
Volatility
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) is 1.91%, while Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that CRPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRPA.L | CLIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 2.48% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.93% | 6.01% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.12% | 7.75% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.77% | 9.41% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 8.59% | -1.81% |
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRPA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CLIM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CRPA.L vs. CLIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRPA.L nor CLIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRPA.L and CLIM.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRPA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRPA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CLIM.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRPA.L and 0.25% for CLIM.L.
Find the right allocation for CRPA.L and CLIM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer