CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating (V3GU.L).
CLIM.L and V3GU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLIM.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. It was launched on Feb 21, 2017. V3GU.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. It was launched on May 20, 2021. Both CLIM.L and V3GU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM.L Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | -0.47% | 5.06% | -1.39% | 4.76% | -13.57% | -2.87% |
V3GU.L Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating | 1.11% | -1.29% | 5.79% | 3.19% | -4.83% | 3.54% |
Different Trading Currencies
CLIM.L is traded in GBP, while V3GU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the V3GU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLIM.L achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than V3GU.L's 1.11% return.
CLIM.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- -1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
V3GU.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 1.68%
- 3Y*
- 2.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM.L
V3GU.L
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating (V3GU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLIM.L | V3GU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.22 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 0.35 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 0.43 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | 0.81 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLIM.L | V3GU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.22 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.19 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM.L and V3GU.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLIM.L nor V3GU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM.L drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, which is greater than V3GU.L's maximum drawdown of -13.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM.L and V3GU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM.L | V3GU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.39% | -18.89% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.32% | -2.85% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.41% | -1.71% | -14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.87% | -7.03% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 0.70% | +0.87% |
Volatility
CLIM.L vs. V3GU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L) is 2.07%, while Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Accumulating (V3GU.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that CLIM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3GU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM.L | V3GU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.07% | 2.80% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.84% | 5.07% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 7.46% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 9.19% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 9.19% | -1.62% |