CRPA.L vs. BINC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC).
CRPA.L and BINC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRPA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. It was launched on May 10, 2018. BINC is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 19, 2023.
Performance
CRPA.L vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRPA.L vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPA.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.94% | 9.97% | 1.12% | 7.34% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | -0.37% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRPA.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's -0.37% return.
CRPA.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- —
BINC
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRPA.L vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRPA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRPA.L vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
CRPA.L
BINC
CRPA.L vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRPA.L | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.84 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.43 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 2.00 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 8.09 | -2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRPA.L | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.84 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 2.33 | -2.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRPA.L and BINC is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CRPA.L vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
CRPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPA.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.91% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
Drawdowns
CRPA.L vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRPA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.34%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPA.L and BINC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRPA.L | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.34% | -2.69% | -22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -2.69% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -1.74% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -0.33% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.67% | +0.33% |
Volatility
CRPA.L vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.30%. This indicates that CRPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRPA.L | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 1.30% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.38% | 1.71% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.30% | 2.95% | +2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.70% | 3.03% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 3.03% | +3.75% |