PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRPA.L vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRPA.L vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRPA.L vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CRPA.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.94%9.97%1.12%7.34%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
-0.37%7.57%5.76%7.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRPA.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's -0.37% return.


CRPA.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*

BINC

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
0.82%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRPA.L vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRPA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRPA.L vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPA.L
CRPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CRPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CRPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPA.L vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRPA.LBINCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.84

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

2.43

-0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.00

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.23

8.09

-2.86

CRPA.L vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRPA.L and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRPA.LBINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.84

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

2.33

-2.02

Correlation

The correlation between CRPA.L and BINC is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CRPA.L vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

CRPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.


TTM202520242023
CRPA.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.91%5.86%6.14%3.13%

Drawdowns

CRPA.L vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRPA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.34%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPA.L and BINC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRPA.LBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.34%

-2.69%

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-2.69%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-1.74%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-0.33%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.67%

+0.33%

Volatility

CRPA.L vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.30%. This indicates that CRPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRPA.LBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

1.30%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

1.71%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.30%

2.95%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

3.03%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.78%

3.03%

+3.75%