CRNC vs. QUBT
CRNC (Cerence Inc.) and QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CRNC in Software - Application, QUBT in Computer Hardware. Over the past 5 years, CRNC returned -35.25%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for QUBT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRNC vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRNC achieves a 15.34% return, which is significantly higher than QUBT's 9.06% return.
CRNC
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 25.05%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 6M
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- 26.85%
- 3Y*
- -24.28%
- 5Y*
- -35.25%
- 10Y*
- —
QUBT
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 17.05%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- -17.60%
- 1Y
- -12.78%
- 3Y*
- 106.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
CRNC vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRNC Cerence Inc. | 15.34% | 36.18% | -60.07% | 6.10% | -75.82% | -23.73% | 344.01% | 47.43% |
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 9.06% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -55.72% | -75.83% | 370.33% | -14.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRNC and QUBT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2019 | 0.29 |
The correlation between CRNC and QUBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRNC:
$578.26M
QUBT:
$2.51B
CRNC:
-$0.44
QUBT:
-$0.21
CRNC:
1.82
QUBT:
483.00
CRNC:
3.65
QUBT:
1.57
CRNC:
$302.14M
QUBT:
$4.33M
CRNC:
$235.95M
QUBT:
-$667.00K
CRNC:
$34.08M
QUBT:
-$52.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRNC vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank
CRNC
QUBT
CRNC vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerence Inc. (CRNC) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRNC | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.07 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | -0.17 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | -0.27 | +1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRNC | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | -0.12 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.11 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.06 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
CRNC vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRNC drawdown since its inception was -98.22%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRNC and QUBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRNC | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.22% | -97.53% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.92% | -74.37% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.25% | -82.40% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.09% | -95.63% | -2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.76% | -56.43% | -34.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.97% | -72.98% | +10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.78% | 47.80% | -21.02% |
Volatility
CRNC vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cerence Inc. (CRNC) is 22.33%, while Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a volatility of 36.09%. This indicates that CRNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRNC | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.33% | 36.09% | -13.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.54% | 67.55% | -11.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.31% | 107.46% | -21.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.49% | 133.09% | -19.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.36% | 177.72% | -71.36% |
Dividends
CRNC vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRNC nor QUBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRNC vs. QUBT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerence Inc. and Quantum Computing, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRNC and QUBT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBT has higher volatility (36.09%) compared to CRNC (22.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRNC dropped -98.22% vs QUBT's -97.53%.
CRNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRNC and QUBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer