PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRNC vs. QUBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRNC vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cerence Inc. (CRNC) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRNC achieves a -7.58% return, which is significantly lower than QUBT's -5.46% return.


CRNC

1D
-1.98%
1M
-10.02%
YTD
-7.58%
6M
-12.80%
1Y
-0.80%
3Y*
-29.54%
5Y*
-38.46%
10Y*

QUBT

1D
-7.53%
1M
-21.20%
YTD
-5.46%
6M
-15.06%
1Y
-44.65%
3Y*
94.42%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRNC vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CRNC
Cerence Inc.
-7.58%36.18%-60.07%6.10%-75.82%-23.73%344.01%31.65%
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
-5.46%-38.01%1,712.51%-39.53%-55.72%-75.83%370.33%-14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CRNC and QUBT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.30

The correlation between CRNC and QUBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRNC:

$463.36M

QUBT:

$2.17B

EPS

CRNC:

-$0.44

QUBT:

-$0.21

PS Ratio

CRNC:

1.46

QUBT:

418.68

PB Ratio

CRNC:

2.92

QUBT:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRNC:

$302.14M

QUBT:

$4.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRNC:

$235.95M

QUBT:

-$667.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

CRNC:

$34.08M

QUBT:

-$52.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRNC vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRNC
CRNC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CRNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRNC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CRNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRNC Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QUBT
QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRNC vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerence Inc. (CRNC) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRNCQUBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.98

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

-0.60

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

-0.90

+0.87

CRNC vs. QUBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRNC Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the QUBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRNC and QUBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRNC vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRNC drawdown since its inception was -98.22%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRNC and QUBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRNCQUBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.22%

-97.53%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.92%

-74.37%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.96%

-82.40%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.09%

-95.63%

-2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.60%

-62.23%

-30.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.25%

-72.85%

+9.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.15%

49.50%

-22.35%

Volatility

CRNC vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cerence Inc. (CRNC) is 26.90%, while Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a volatility of 28.97%. This indicates that CRNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRNCQUBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.90%

28.97%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.31%

68.16%

-8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.64%

101.16%

-13.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.90%

133.28%

-19.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.37%

177.30%

-70.93%

Dividends

CRNC vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRNC nor QUBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRNC vs. QUBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerence Inc. and Quantum Computing, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
64.19M
3.69M
(CRNC) Total Revenue
(QUBT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CRNC and QUBT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBT has higher volatility (28.97%) compared to CRNC (26.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRNC dropped -98.22% vs QUBT's -97.53%.

CRNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRNC and QUBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer