CRMX vs. QTJL
CRMX (Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRMX is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
CRMX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRMX
- 1D
- -10.24%
- 1M
- -61.90%
- 6M
- -94.79%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
CRMX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRMX Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -92.80% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMX and QTJL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
CRMX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTJL
CRMX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRMX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRMX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMX drawdown since its inception was -95.91%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMX and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.91% | -33.40% | -62.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.91% | -4.09% | -91.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.74% | -7.77% | -70.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.37% | — |
Volatility
CRMX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 268.49% | 10.68% | +257.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 268.49% | 20.34% | +248.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 268.49% | 20.26% | +248.23% |
CRMX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRMX nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CRMX.
CRMX and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CRMX and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for CRMX and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer