CRMX vs. QQQP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CRMX (Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. CRMX is passively managed, while QQQP is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRMX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QQQP.

Performance

CRMX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMX

• 1D: -19.10%
• 1M: -53.36%
• 6M: -93.94%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQP

• 1D: -3.42%
• 1M: -7.32%
• 6M: 19.26%
• YTD: 21.65%
• 1Y: 42.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMX Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-91.98%
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMX and QQQP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

CRMX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQP

QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 41
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRMX	QQQP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.87	—

Drawdowns

CRMX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMX drawdown since its inception was -95.45%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMX and QQQP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMX	QQQP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.45%	-42.50%	-52.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.45%	-10.77%	-84.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.61%	-7.26%	-71.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMX	QQQP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	269.21%	35.84%	+233.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	269.21%	44.34%	+224.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	269.21%	44.34%	+224.87%

CRMX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQP's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMX nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMX and QQQP in my portfolio?

CRMX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMX or QQQP?

On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMX or QQQP?

QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CRMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMX or QQQP?

CRMX and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMX and QQQP?

Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CRMX and 1.30% for QQQP.