PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMX vs. QQQP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRMX

1D
-22.81%
1M
-54.32%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQP

1D
-7.73%
1M
2.04%
YTD
24.17%
6M
19.48%
1Y
61.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRMX and QQQP is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMX

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRMX vs. QQQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMXQQQPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

0.95

-1.29

Drawdowns

CRMX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMX drawdown since its inception was -92.84%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMX and QQQP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMXQQQPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.84%

-42.50%

-50.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.54%

-8.92%

-80.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.93%

-7.32%

-68.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

Volatility

CRMX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMXQQQPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

293.38%

33.03%

+260.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

293.38%

44.14%

+249.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

293.38%

44.14%

+249.24%

CRMX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQP's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMX nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CRMX.

CRMX and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CRMX and 1.30% for QQQP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMX and QQQP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer