CRMX vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CRMX (Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRMX is passively managed, while COTG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. CRMX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

CRMX vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMX

• 1D: 4.89%
• 1M: -16.82%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COTG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -15.48%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 16.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMX vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMX Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-79.69%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	-4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMX and COTG is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	-0.19

Return for Risk

CRMX vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CRMX vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMX drawdown since its inception was -92.84%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMX and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMX	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.84%	-25.69%	-67.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.47%	-25.58%	-62.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.58%	-9.64%	-66.94%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMX	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	282.72%	40.09%	+242.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	282.72%	40.09%	+242.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	282.72%	40.09%	+242.63%

CRMX vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMX vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMX nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMX and COTG in my portfolio?

CRMX and COTG have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMX or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMX or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CRMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMX or COTG?

CRMX and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMX and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CRMX and 0.75% for COTG.