CRMU vs. SAA

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML) while SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRMU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SAA.

Performance

CRMU vs. SAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMU

• 1D: -12.68%
• 1M: -38.92%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAA

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 2.69%
• 6M: 28.25%
• YTD: 41.54%
• 1Y: 56.43%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 4.06%
• 10Y*: 11.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMU vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-76.87%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	18.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMU and SAA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.54

Return for Risk

CRMU vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SAA

SAA Risk / Return Rank: 60
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMU vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRMU	SAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.49	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.57	—

Drawdowns

CRMU vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, smaller than the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and SAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMU	SAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.87%	-87.39%	+10.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.87%	-3.97%	-72.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.08%	-27.29%	-21.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMU	SAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	235.19%	35.80%	+199.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	235.19%	43.44%	+191.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	235.19%	46.01%	+189.18%

CRMU vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SAA's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMU vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison

CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	0.77%	1.05%	1.36%	0.88%	0.46%	0.00%	0.03%	0.35%	0.27%	0.00%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMU and SAA in my portfolio?

CRMU and SAA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMU or SAA?

On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMU or SAA?

CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMU or SAA?

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.

What is the main difference between CRMU and SAA?

CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML), while SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMU and 0.95% for SAA.