PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMSX vs. SWSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMSX achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly lower than SWSSX's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CRMSX has underperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.


CRMSX

1D
2.21%
1M
8.33%
YTD
16.04%
6M
15.50%
1Y
30.82%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
8.87%

SWSSX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.00%
YTD
18.71%
6M
17.43%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRMSX
CRM Small Cap Value Fund
16.04%2.61%17.86%9.71%-6.05%16.50%-3.28%25.82%-15.48%14.13%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
18.71%12.88%11.57%17.07%-20.43%14.77%20.12%25.63%-11.19%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMSX and SWSSX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.93

The correlation between CRMSX and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMSX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMSX
CRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SWSSX
SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMSXSWSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.97

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

14.11

-5.67

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SWSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMSX and SWSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMSXSWSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.28

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.30

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.47

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.36

+0.10

Drawdowns

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMSX and SWSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMSXSWSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-60.34%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-11.00%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-27.50%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

-31.93%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.66%

-41.81%

-5.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-10.73%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

3.09%

+0.79%

Volatility

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison

CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) at 5.61%. This indicates that CRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMSXSWSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

5.61%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

13.60%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

19.15%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

22.59%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

24.09%

-1.29%

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMSX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMSX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison

CRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, more than SWSSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRMSX
CRM Small Cap Value Fund
9.23%10.71%10.29%4.44%16.87%12.53%0.46%7.17%12.30%16.69%7.54%23.38%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
1.08%1.29%1.66%1.49%1.32%8.88%2.55%6.12%10.45%5.22%4.10%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMSX and SWSSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRMSX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to SWSSX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMSX dropped -55.09% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.

SWSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMSX and SWSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer