CRMG vs. VRTL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRMG returned -60.55% vs 408.15% for VRTL. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.

Performance

CRMG vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -56.09% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 213.68% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -56.09%
• 6M: -50.25%
• 1Y: -60.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTL

• 1D: -5.10%
• 1M: -13.08%
• YTD: 213.68%
• 6M: 137.88%
• 1Y: 408.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-56.09%	3.69%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	213.68%	428.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and VRTL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 86
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRMG	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	3.60	-4.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.14	3.38	-4.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.42	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	8.67	-9.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	22.06	-23.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRMG vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the VRTL Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMG and VRTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMG	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	3.60	-4.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.65	3.10	-3.75

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and VRTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	VRTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.38%	-60.58%	-13.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.91%	-47.45%	-23.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.87%	-27.98%	-39.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.81%	-15.20%	-22.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.08%	18.62%	+22.46%

Volatility

CRMG vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) have volatilities of 34.03% and 33.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	VRTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.03%	33.58%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.87%	87.68%	-23.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.31%	114.41%	-39.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.62%	124.31%	-48.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.62%	124.31%	-48.69%

CRMG vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMG vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMG nor VRTL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and VRTL in my portfolio?

CRMG and VRTL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRMG or VRTL?

CRMG has higher volatility (34.03%) compared to VRTL (33.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMG dropped -74.38% vs VRTL's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or VRTL?

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 408.15% vs -60.55% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VRTL has been the lower-risk option at 33.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRMG or VRTL?

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 408.15% return vs -60.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or VRTL?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or VRTL?

CRMG and VRTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMG and VRTL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 1.50% for VRTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.