CRMG vs. GGLL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRMG is actively managed, while GGLL is passively managed. Over the past year, CRMG returned -60.55% vs 311.83% for GGLL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GGLL.

Performance

CRMG vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -56.09% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 30.87% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -56.09%
• 6M: -50.25%
• 1Y: -60.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GGLL

• 1D: 7.06%
• 1M: -9.57%
• YTD: 30.87%
• 6M: 25.77%
• 1Y: 311.83%
• 3Y*: 68.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-56.09%	3.69%
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	30.87%	300.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and GGLL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

GGLL

GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 95
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRMG	GGLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	5.36	-6.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.14	5.11	-6.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.61	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	8.18	-9.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	28.11	-29.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRMG vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 5.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMG and GGLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMG	GGLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	5.36	-6.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.65	1.03	-1.69

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and GGLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	GGLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.38%	-52.81%	-21.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.91%	-38.39%	-32.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-52.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.87%	-15.44%	-52.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.81%	-15.17%	-22.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.08%	11.15%	+29.93%

Volatility

CRMG vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a higher volatility of 34.03% compared to Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) at 17.94%. This indicates that CRMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	GGLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.03%	17.94%	+16.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.87%	41.25%	+22.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.31%	58.62%	+16.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.62%	56.11%	+19.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.62%	56.11%	+19.51%

CRMG vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMG vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	3.49%	4.16%	3.29%	2.05%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and GGLL in my portfolio?

CRMG and GGLL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRMG or GGLL?

CRMG has higher volatility (34.03%) compared to GGLL (17.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMG dropped -74.38% vs GGLL's -52.81%.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or GGLL?

On 1-year performance, GGLL leads with 311.83% vs -60.55% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GGLL has been the lower-risk option at 17.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRMG or GGLL?

Over the 1-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 311.83% return vs -60.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or GGLL?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GGLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or GGLL?

GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between CRMG and GGLL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 1.05% for GGLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.36 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.