CRMG vs. CRCG
CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and CRCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CRCG.
Performance
CRMG vs. CRCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -72.43% return, which is significantly lower than CRCG's -58.00% return.
CRMG
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -32.01%
- YTD
- -72.43%
- 6M
- -72.59%
- 1Y
- -75.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCG
- 1D
- -6.59%
- 1M
- -60.01%
- YTD
- -58.00%
- 6M
- -61.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG vs. CRCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -72.43% | 11.88% |
CRCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF | -58.00% | -83.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMG and CRCG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMG vs. CRCG — Risk / Return Rank
CRMG
CRCG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG vs. CRCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF (CRCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRMG | CRCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRMG vs. CRCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, smaller than the maximum CRCG drawdown of -93.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and CRCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMG | CRCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.83% | -93.85% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.83% | -93.09% | +13.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -70.50% | +31.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.94% | — | — |
Volatility
CRMG vs. CRCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMG | CRCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.86% | 195.07% | -119.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.19% | 195.07% | -119.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.19% | 195.07% | -119.88% |
CRMG vs. CRCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCG's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMG vs. CRCG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRMG nor CRCG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMG and CRCG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CRCG.
CRMG and CRCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 0.78% for CRCG.
Find the right allocation for CRMG and CRCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer