CRMG vs. BRKW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRMG returned -75.69% vs -3.41% for BRKW. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.

Performance

CRMG vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -72.43% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -5.09% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: -32.01%
• YTD: -72.43%
• 6M: -72.59%
• 1Y: -75.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: -5.09%
• 6M: -4.87%
• 1Y: -3.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-72.43%	-8.78%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-5.09%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and BRKW is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 1
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 7
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRMG	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	-0.20	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.94	-0.16	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	0.98	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.27	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	-0.54	-1.18

CRMG vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMG Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the BRKW Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMG and BRKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.83%	-12.64%	-67.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.80%	-12.64%	-64.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.83%	-8.12%	-71.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-5.47%	-33.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.94%	6.27%	+37.67%

Volatility

CRMG vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a higher volatility of 32.06% compared to Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) at 4.69%. This indicates that CRMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.06%	4.69%	+27.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.55%	12.75%	+50.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.86%	17.21%	+58.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.19%	17.16%	+58.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.19%	17.16%	+58.03%

CRMG vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMG vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.75%.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	25.75%	14.45%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and BRKW in my portfolio?

CRMG and BRKW have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRMG or BRKW?

CRMG has higher volatility (32.06%) compared to BRKW (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMG dropped -79.83% vs BRKW's -12.64%.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or BRKW?

On 1-year performance, BRKW leads with -3.41% vs -75.69% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BRKW has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRMG or BRKW?

Over the 1-year period, BRKW has performed better with a -3.41% return vs -75.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or BRKW?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or BRKW?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.75%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between CRMG and BRKW?

CRMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 0.99% for BRKW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.