CRMG vs. BRKW

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.

Performance

CRMG vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -57.62% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -4.73% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -3.49%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: -57.62%
• 6M: -56.45%
• 1Y: -62.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: -4.73%
• 6M: -5.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-57.62%	-6.99%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-4.73%	2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and BRKW is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRMG	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMG	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	-0.16	-0.51

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.38%	-12.64%	-61.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.99%	-7.77%	-61.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.92%	-5.37%	-32.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.38%	17.36%	+58.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.55%	17.36%	+58.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.55%	17.36%	+58.19%

CRMG vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMG vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.39%.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	24.39%	14.45%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and BRKW in my portfolio?

CRMG and BRKW have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or BRKW?

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or BRKW?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or BRKW?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 24.39%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between CRMG and BRKW?

CRMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 0.99% for BRKW.