CRM vs. ATRA
CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) and ATRA (Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.) are both stocks. CRM operates in Software - Application (Technology), while ATRA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CRM returned 7.60%/yr vs -31.94%/yr for ATRA. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRM vs. ATRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -37.06% return, which is significantly higher than ATRA's -42.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has outperformed ATRA with an annualized return of 7.60%, while ATRA has yielded a comparatively lower -31.94% annualized return.
CRM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- -37.06%
- 6M
- -36.31%
- 1Y
- -37.22%
- 3Y*
- -6.88%
- 5Y*
- -6.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
ATRA
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -42.45%
- 6M
- -42.15%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- -42.05%
- 5Y*
- -50.77%
- 10Y*
- -31.94%
CRM vs. ATRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | -37.06% | -20.25% | 27.76% | 98.46% | -47.83% | 14.20% | 36.82% | 18.74% | 33.98% | 49.33% |
ATRA Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc. | -42.45% | 35.91% | 3.82% | -84.37% | -79.19% | -19.71% | 19.19% | -52.59% | 91.93% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRM and ATRA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CRM and ATRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRM:
$144.49B
ATRA:
$146.58M
CRM:
$8.59
ATRA:
-$0.72
CRM:
3.62
ATRA:
6.06
CRM:
$42.83B
ATRA:
$22.62M
CRM:
$33.25B
ATRA:
$21.73M
CRM:
$12.32B
ATRA:
-$6.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRM vs. ATRA — Risk / Return Rank
CRM
ATRA
CRM vs. ATRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ATRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRM | ATRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.22 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 0.25 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 0.44 | -2.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRM vs. ATRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, smaller than the maximum ATRA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and ATRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRM | ATRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.50% | -99.74% | +29.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.36% | -76.89% | +37.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.70% | -92.76% | +38.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.62% | -99.16% | +40.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.62% | -99.68% | +41.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.33% | -99.35% | +45.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | -74.03% | +57.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.92% | 44.08% | -23.16% |
Volatility
CRM vs. ATRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is 16.76%, while Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ATRA) has a volatility of 21.61%. This indicates that CRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRM | ATRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.76% | 21.61% | -4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.59% | 131.62% | -100.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.09% | 143.90% | -105.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.07% | 121.99% | -84.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.38% | 100.19% | -64.81% |
Dividends
CRM vs. ATRA - Dividend Comparison
CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while ATRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ATRA Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.63% | 0.48% |
Financials
CRM vs. ATRA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Salesforce, Inc. and Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRM and ATRA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATRA has higher volatility (21.61%) compared to CRM (16.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRM dropped -70.50% vs ATRA's -99.74%.
ATRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRM and ATRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer