PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRIMX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRIMX having a 14.19% return and FSMDX slightly higher at 14.62%. Over the past 10 years, CRIMX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.


CRIMX

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.27%
6M
8.75%
YTD
14.19%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
10.75%

FSMDX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.55%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRIMX
CRM Mid Cap Value Fund
14.19%9.15%8.84%6.58%-9.22%29.14%10.75%24.87%-7.00%19.25%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.62%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CRIMX and FSMDX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.94

The correlation between CRIMX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRIMX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRIMX
CRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRIMXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.31

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

8.94

-2.48

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRIMX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRIMX drawdown since its inception was -49.69%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRIMX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRIMXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.69%

-40.35%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-8.16%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.07%

-20.92%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-26.07%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.68%

-40.35%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-0.94%

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-4.91%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

2.10%

+1.48%

Volatility

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 2.43%. This indicates that CRIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRIMXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

2.43%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

10.22%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

13.71%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.26%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

19.27%

-0.19%

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRIMX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRIMX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

CRIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than FSMDX's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRIMX
CRM Mid Cap Value Fund
5.21%5.94%9.75%6.25%4.33%19.21%2.03%3.01%10.26%20.06%4.13%40.25%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.76%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CRIMX and FSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CRIMX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FSMDX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRIMX dropped -49.69% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRIMX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer