PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRHG.L achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than V3GP.L's 0.59% return.


CRHG.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*

V3GP.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.91%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CRHG.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.72%5.84%3.84%7.67%-15.04%1.08%
V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
0.59%6.20%3.56%7.64%-14.57%1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CRHG.L and V3GP.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.93

The correlation between CRHG.L and V3GP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRHG.L
CRHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CRHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CRHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

V3GP.L
V3GP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRHG.LV3GP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.63

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

5.57

+0.11

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRHG.L and V3GP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRHG.LV3GP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.09

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.10

+0.22

Drawdowns

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRHG.L drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, roughly equal to the maximum V3GP.L drawdown of -20.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRHG.L and V3GP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRHG.LV3GP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-20.15%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.67%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

-3.83%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-20.15%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.64%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-7.78%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.78%

+0.06%

Volatility

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) have volatilities of 1.45% and 1.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRHG.LV3GP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.43%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

2.80%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.60%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

5.42%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

5.42%

+0.32%

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRHG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GP.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CRHG.L vs. V3GP.L - Dividend Comparison

CRHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than V3GP.L's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CRHG.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.09%4.01%3.76%3.18%2.70%2.02%2.27%2.66%1.27%
V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
4.37%4.43%4.36%4.10%2.48%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRHG.L and V3GP.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CRHG.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CRHG.L and 0.15% for V3GP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRHG.L and V3GP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer