CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSMG.L).

CRHG.L and FSMG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRHG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. FSMG.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. It was launched on Mar 23, 2021. Both CRHG.L and FSMG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSMG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRHG.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)	-0.20%	5.84%	3.84%	7.67%	-15.04%	2.23%
FSMG.L Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD	0.93%	2.65%	2.78%	3.90%	-5.75%	4.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRHG.L achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than FSMG.L's 0.93% return.

CRHG.L

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: -0.20%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 4.45%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: —

FSMG.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 3.18%
• 5Y*: 1.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRHG.L and FSMG.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CRHG.L

iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)

FSMG.L

Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD

Return for Risk

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRHG.L

CRHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
CRHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CRHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CRHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CRHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CRHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FSMG.L

FSMG.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
FSMG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FSMG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FSMG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FSMG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FSMG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSMG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRHG.L	FSMG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	0.66	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	0.96	+0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.12	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	0.94	+0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.19	1.89	+4.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the FSMG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRHG.L and FSMG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRHG.L	FSMG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	0.66	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.21	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.22	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between CRHG.L and FSMG.L is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Dividend Comparison

CRHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than FSMG.L's 5.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRHG.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)	4.13%	4.01%	3.76%	3.18%	2.70%	2.02%	2.27%	2.66%	1.27%
FSMG.L Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD	5.91%	4.83%	5.10%	4.67%	2.87%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRHG.L drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, which is greater than FSMG.L's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRHG.L and FSMG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRHG.L	FSMG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.54%	-11.66%	-8.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.71%	-4.12%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	-11.66%	-8.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-1.77%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-4.60%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	2.04%	-1.31%

Volatility

CRHG.L vs. FSMG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSMG.L) have volatilities of 1.77% and 1.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRHG.L	FSMG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	1.82%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.58%	4.33%	-1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.61%	6.14%	-1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.62%	7.35%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.74%	7.35%	-1.61%