PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CTY.L vs. FGT.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CTY.LFGT.L
YTD Return8.58%1.75%
1Y Return15.79%5.44%
3Y Return (Ann)7.72%0.50%
5Y Return (Ann)5.40%1.40%
10Y Return (Ann)5.61%7.18%
Sharpe Ratio1.340.38
Sortino Ratio1.930.61
Omega Ratio1.251.07
Calmar Ratio1.950.37
Martin Ratio7.052.01
Ulcer Index2.07%2.20%
Daily Std Dev10.90%11.78%
Max Drawdown-67.77%-53.70%
Current Drawdown-4.10%-4.01%

Fundamentals


CTY.LFGT.L
Market Cap£2.10B£1.39B
EPS£0.59£0.04
PE Ratio7.12212.88
Total Revenue (TTM)£241.02M£96.62M
Gross Profit (TTM)£234.59M£91.89M
EBITDA (TTM)£166.57M-£1.29M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CTY.L and FGT.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CTY.L vs. FGT.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CTY.L achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than FGT.L's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CTY.L has underperformed FGT.L with an annualized return of 5.61%, while FGT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.26%
4.65%
CTY.L
FGT.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTY.L vs. FGT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L) and Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 8.33, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.33
FGT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.80
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 3.75, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.75

CTY.L vs. FGT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the FGT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTY.L and FGT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.63
0.80
CTY.L
FGT.L

Dividends

CTY.L vs. FGT.L - Dividend Comparison

CTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than FGT.L's 2.30% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CTY.L
The City of London Investment Trust plc
4.92%4.92%4.82%4.86%5.13%4.24%4.66%3.86%3.95%1.04%0.04%3.81%
FGT.L
Finsbury Growth & Income Trust
2.30%2.22%2.15%1.86%1.90%1.84%2.03%1.83%2.01%1.13%0.02%2.03%

Drawdowns

CTY.L vs. FGT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTY.L drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, which is greater than FGT.L's maximum drawdown of -53.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTY.L and FGT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.72%
-7.57%
CTY.L
FGT.L

Volatility

CTY.L vs. FGT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L) is 3.44%, while Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that CTY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.44%
4.78%
CTY.L
FGT.L

Financials

CTY.L vs. FGT.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The City of London Investment Trust plc and Finsbury Growth & Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items