CRFIX vs. CLDAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX).

CRFIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Apr 28, 2022. CLDAX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Dec 30, 2004.

Performance

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRFIX Calvert Focused Value Fund	-4.34%	13.26%	12.24%	8.84%	-1.34%
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	-0.96%	7.27%	1.39%	5.04%	-4.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRFIX achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly lower than CLDAX's -0.96% return.

CRFIX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -10.56%
• YTD: -4.34%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 8.82%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLDAX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -2.55%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 6M: 0.08%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: -0.14%
• 10Y*: 3.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRFIX and CLDAX have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

CRFIX

Calvert Focused Value Fund

CLDAX

Calvert Core Bond Fund

Return for Risk

CRFIX vs. CLDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRFIX

CRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

CLDAX

CLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 47
CLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRFIX	CLDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	0.94	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	1.35	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.17	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	1.47	-0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.51	4.61	-2.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the CLDAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRFIX and CLDAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRFIX	CLDAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	0.94	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.82	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between CRFIX and CLDAX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Dividend Comparison

CRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than CLDAX's 3.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRFIX Calvert Focused Value Fund	6.03%	5.77%	4.37%	1.02%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	3.91%	4.24%	4.16%	3.17%	1.80%	6.08%	5.22%	3.04%	3.63%	3.02%	7.02%	2.85%

Drawdowns

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRFIX drawdown since its inception was -18.29%, roughly equal to the maximum CLDAX drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRFIX and CLDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRFIX	CLDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.29%	-18.88%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-3.04%	-9.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.97%	-4.35%	-7.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-3.92%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	0.97%	+2.39%

Volatility

CRFIX vs. CLDAX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) at 1.61%. This indicates that CRFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRFIX	CLDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	1.61%	+2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.19%	2.56%	+6.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.62%	4.27%	+12.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	5.59%	+10.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	6.85%	+8.84%