CRF vs. BLUEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX).
CRF is managed by Cornerstone. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990. BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991.
Performance
CRF vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRF vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | -8.05% | 12.46% | 44.39% | 19.49% | -36.70% | 39.73% | 28.13% | 21.74% | -11.74% | 21.35% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -8.68% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRF achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, CRF has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
CRF
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 19.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- -7.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRF vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRF has a 1.84% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRF vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
CRF
BLUEX
CRF vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRF | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | -0.66 | +1.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | -0.89 | +2.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.89 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | -0.69 | +2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | -2.40 | +7.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRF | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | -0.66 | +1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.05 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.49 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRF and BLUEX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CRF vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
CRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.94%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | 19.94% | 17.38% | 14.32% | 19.94% | 29.31% | 13.41% | 18.91% | 21.67% | 24.85% | 17.96% | 24.08% | 23.58% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
CRF vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRF drawdown since its inception was -80.70%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRF and BLUEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRF | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.70% | -54.27% | -26.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -12.19% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.12% | -21.87% | -21.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | -29.06% | -16.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -10.58% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.39% | -13.39% | -9.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 3.51% | +0.57% |
Volatility
CRF vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.64%. This indicates that CRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRF | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 3.64% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 7.31% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 11.01% | +9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 10.50% | +15.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.86% | 16.57% | +9.29% |