PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CREDX vs. ECAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CREDX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Credit Strategies Fund (CREDX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CREDX achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 12.06% return.


CREDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*

ECAT

1D
0.00%
1M
2.19%
YTD
12.06%
6M
10.41%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CREDX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CREDX
BlackRock Credit Strategies Fund
1.80%5.55%8.41%12.18%-12.08%-0.43%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
12.06%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CREDX and ECAT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CREDX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CREDX
CREDX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CREDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CREDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CREDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CREDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CREDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CREDX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Credit Strategies Fund (CREDX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CREDXECATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

1.90

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

7.04

+3.79

CREDX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CREDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CREDX and ECAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CREDX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CREDX drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum ECAT drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CREDX and ECAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CREDXECATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-32.23%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.33%

-11.80%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.47%

-15.79%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.46%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-9.04%

+5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

3.17%

-2.69%

Volatility

CREDX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Credit Strategies Fund (CREDX) is 0.72%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that CREDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CREDXECATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

4.36%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

10.99%

-8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

13.79%

-10.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.42%

16.89%

-13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.32%

16.89%

-13.57%

CREDX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CREDX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

CREDX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

CREDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, less than ECAT's 21.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CREDX
BlackRock Credit Strategies Fund
9.20%9.16%9.78%9.98%3.41%5.69%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
21.78%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


CREDX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECAT has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to CREDX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CREDX dropped -15.13% vs ECAT's -32.23%.

CREDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CREDX and ECAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer