CRDU vs. QQQP
CRDU (Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
CRDU vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDU achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than QQQP's 15.23% return.
CRDU
- 1D
- 5.65%
- 1M
- -32.83%
- 6M
- 52.23%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QQQP
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 37.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.77M | $27.02M | $41.88M | |
| $865.31K | $566.51K | $438.05K |
CRDU vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRDU Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF | 10.25% | -39.80% |
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 15.23% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDU and QQQP is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDU vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank
CRDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQP
CRDU vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRDU | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDU vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDU drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDU and QQQP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDU | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -42.50% | -42.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.47% | -15.47% | -44.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.35% | -7.46% | -35.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.01% | — |
Volatility
CRDU vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDU | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 189.32% | 37.67% | +151.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.32% | 44.67% | +144.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 189.32% | 44.67% | +144.65% |
CRDU vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CRDU and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
CRDU vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRDU nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDU and QQQP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRDU and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
CRDU and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for CRDU and QQQP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer