CRDT vs. XAGG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

CRDT vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDT achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly higher than XAGG's 2.05% return.

CRDT

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 3.61%
• 6M: 4.78%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAGG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDT vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF	3.61%	0.55%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	2.05%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDT and XAGG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

CRDT vs. XAGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDT

CRDT Risk / Return Rank: 15
CRDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CRDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CRDT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CRDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
CRDT Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDT vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRDT	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.33	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRDT	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.94	-1.30

Drawdowns

CRDT vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDT drawdown since its inception was -9.80%, which is greater than XAGG's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDT and XAGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRDT	XAGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.80%	-2.88%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-0.37%	-1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-0.57%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRDT	XAGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.83%	3.47%	+5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.07%	3.47%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.07%	3.47%	+3.60%

CRDT vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRDT and XAGG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

CRDT vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison

CRDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than XAGG's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF	6.23%	7.04%	7.29%	2.59%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	3.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRDT and XAGG in my portfolio?

CRDT and XAGG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRDT or XAGG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRDT or XAGG?

CRDT and XAGG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRDT or XAGG?

CRDT has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.

What is the main difference between CRDT and XAGG?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Eaton Vance.