PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDT vs. VNLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRDT vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRDT vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CRDT
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
-2.25%-0.67%5.19%5.16%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
0.57%5.45%6.41%3.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDT achieves a -2.25% return, which is significantly lower than VNLA's 0.57% return.


CRDT

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
-2.25%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
-5.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VNLA

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.57%
6M
1.79%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRDT vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRDT vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDT
CRDT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CRDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDT vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRDTVNLADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.69

6.55

-7.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.86

11.33

-12.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

3.14

-2.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

10.06

-10.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.44

44.83

-46.27

CRDT vs. VNLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the VNLA Sharpe Ratio of 6.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDT and VNLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRDTVNLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

6.55

-7.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

2.06

-1.66

Correlation

The correlation between CRDT and VNLA is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CRDT vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison

CRDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than VNLA's 4.87% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CRDT
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
6.90%7.04%7.29%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
4.87%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%

Drawdowns

CRDT vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDT drawdown since its inception was -9.80%, which is greater than VNLA's maximum drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDT and VNLA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDTVNLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-4.49%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-0.47%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-0.23%

-7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-0.24%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

0.11%

+4.13%

Volatility

CRDT vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) at 0.28%. This indicates that CRDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRDTVNLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

0.28%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.21%

0.45%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

0.72%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

1.04%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

1.44%

+5.22%