CRDT vs. SVOL
CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) and SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRDT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRDT returned 2.41% vs 10.62% for SVOL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
CRDT vs. SVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDT achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than SVOL's -0.40% return.
CRDT
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 2.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVOL
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- —
CRDT vs. SVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 2.58% | -0.67% | 5.19% | 5.16% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | -0.40% | 2.41% | 6.77% | 8.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDT and SVOL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.26 |
CRDT vs. SVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CRDT
SVOL
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
CRDT
SVOL
Consumer Cyclical
CRDT
SVOL
Financial Services
CRDT
SVOL
Basic Materials
CRDT
-
SVOL
Communication Services
CRDT
-
SVOL
Consumer Defensive
CRDT
-
SVOL
Energy
CRDT
-
SVOL
Healthcare
CRDT
-
SVOL
Industrials
CRDT
-
SVOL
Technology
CRDT
-
SVOL
Utilities
CRDT
-
SVOL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDT vs. SVOL — Risk / Return Rank
CRDT
SVOL
CRDT vs. SVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRDT | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.12 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.82 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 1.94 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRDT | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.51 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.35 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
CRDT vs. SVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDT drawdown since its inception was -9.80%, smaller than the maximum SVOL drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDT and SVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDT | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -33.50% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -13.01% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -2.98% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -4.77% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 5.49% | -3.09% |
Volatility
CRDT vs. SVOL - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) at 1.41%. This indicates that CRDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDT | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 1.41% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.64% | 9.57% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.77% | 20.90% | -12.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 21.99% | -14.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 21.92% | -14.87% |
CRDT vs. SVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CRDT and SVOL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
CRDT vs. SVOL - Dividend Comparison
CRDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than SVOL's 22.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 6.29% | 7.04% | 7.29% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | 22.10% | 19.82% | 16.79% | 16.36% | 18.32% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDT and SVOL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDT has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to SVOL (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDT dropped -9.80% vs SVOL's -33.50%.
On 1-year performance, SVOL leads with 10.62% vs 2.41% for CRDT. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, SVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SVOL has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRDT and SVOL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.10%, compared with 6.29% for CRDT.
CRDT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while SVOL is Volatility.
SVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDT and SVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer