CRDT vs. PFIX
CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) and PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRDT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while PFIX is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CRDT returned 3.97%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for PFIX. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
CRDT vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDT achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's -1.26% return.
CRDT
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 1Y
- -15.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 20.93%
- 10Y*
- —
CRDT vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 2.76% | -0.67% | 5.19% | 5.20% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | -1.26% | 0.42% | 35.94% | 21.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDT and PFIX is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDT vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank
CRDT
PFIX
CRDT vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRDT | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.93 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | -0.62 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | -0.92 | +2.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDT vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDT drawdown since its inception was -9.80%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDT and PFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDT | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -36.17% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -25.27% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.80% | -36.17% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -18.59% | +16.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -17.21% | +14.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 17.40% | -15.31% |
Volatility
CRDT vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) is 3.76%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that CRDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDT | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 8.67% | -4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.84% | 22.01% | -13.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 29.08% | -19.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.40% | 38.52% | -31.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.40% | 38.15% | -30.75% |
CRDT vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CRDT and PFIX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
CRDT vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison
CRDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than PFIX's 9.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 6.13% | 7.04% | 7.29% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 9.81% | 9.92% | 3.40% | 87.92% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDT and PFIX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIX has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to CRDT (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDT dropped -9.80% vs PFIX's -36.17%.
On 3-year performance, PFIX leads with 17.28% vs 3.97% for CRDT. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, CRDT has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRDT and PFIX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 9.81%, compared with 6.13% for CRDT.
CRDT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while PFIX is Hedge Fund.
CRDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDT and PFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer