PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDSX vs. CMUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CRDSX
Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund
-0.06%5.51%4.81%5.02%-2.53%
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
-1.44%14.69%13.39%19.07%-10.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDSX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than CMUVX's -1.44% return.


CRDSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.91%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
10Y*

CMUVX

1D
0.79%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMUVX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRDSX vs. CMUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDSX
CRDSX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CRDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CMUVX
CMUVX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CMUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CMUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX) and Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRDSXCMUVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

1.08

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

1.61

+1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.24

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.58

+2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.71

7.22

+8.49

CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the CMUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDSX and CMUVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRDSXCMUVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.08

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.48

+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between CRDSX and CMUVX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Dividend Comparison

CRDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than CMUVX's 36.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CRDSX
Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund
3.95%4.32%4.38%3.50%1.89%0.00%
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
36.67%36.14%2.54%2.03%2.47%0.06%

Drawdowns

CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDSX drawdown since its inception was -4.22%, smaller than the maximum CMUVX drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDSX and CMUVX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDSXCMUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-23.51%

+19.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.02%

-7.59%

+6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-4.81%

+3.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-6.48%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

2.12%

-1.88%

Volatility

CRDSX vs. CMUVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX) is 0.59%, while Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that CRDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRDSXCMUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

4.58%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

7.63%

-6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62%

13.75%

-12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.05%

13.24%

-11.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.05%

13.24%

-11.19%