PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDO vs. SNOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRDO vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 74.31% return, which is significantly higher than SNOW's 6.12% return.


CRDO

1D
-5.27%
1M
45.68%
YTD
74.31%
6M
74.28%
1Y
241.28%
3Y*
142.90%
5Y*
10Y*

SNOW

1D
-3.17%
1M
54.40%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.81%
1Y
11.82%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDO vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
74.31%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
6.12%42.06%-22.41%38.64%-43.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDO and SNOW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRDO:

$48.33B

SNOW:

$80.40B

EPS

CRDO:

$2.50

SNOW:

-$3.53

PS Ratio

CRDO:

35.55

SNOW:

15.70

PB Ratio

CRDO:

23.42

SNOW:

39.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRDO:

$1.34B

SNOW:

$5.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRDO:

$908.35M

SNOW:

$3.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRDO:

$463.79M

SNOW:

-$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRDO vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SNOW
SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDO vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRDOSNOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.10

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

0.18

+4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

0.39

+10.37

CRDO vs. SNOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the SNOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDO and SNOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRDO vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum SNOW drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and SNOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDOSNOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.04%

-72.99%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.59%

-56.30%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.05%

-56.30%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-42.08%

+36.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-49.02%

+29.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.17%

25.93%

-3.76%

Volatility

CRDO vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) is 28.41%, while Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a volatility of 35.77%. This indicates that CRDO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRDOSNOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.41%

35.77%

-7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.16%

52.64%

+12.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.70%

65.34%

+20.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.50%

61.88%

+19.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.50%

62.68%

+18.82%

Dividends

CRDO vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRDO nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRDO vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
437.00M
1.39B
(CRDO) Total Revenue
(SNOW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRDO vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Snowflake Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
68.2%
66.6%
Portfolio components
CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

SNOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

SNOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.

SNOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRDO and SNOW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOW has higher volatility (35.77%) compared to CRDO (28.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs SNOW's -72.99%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRDO and SNOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer