CRDBX vs. TTIFX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX).

CRDBX is managed by Potomac Fund Management Inc.. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. TTIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 30, 2014.

Performance

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund	1.84%	25.36%	19.91%	18.44%	-8.22%	28.08%	24.03%
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund	0.19%	6.79%	-2.91%	6.04%	0.93%	8.25%	2.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDBX achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than TTIFX's 0.19% return.

CRDBX

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: 4.80%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 8.34%
• 1Y: 36.76%
• 3Y*: 15.04%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —

TTIFX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: 2.64%
• 5Y*: 2.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDBX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than TTIFX's 0.68% expense ratio.

CRDBX

Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund

TTIFX

Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund

Return for Risk

CRDBX vs. TTIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDBX

CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 95
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

TTIFX

TTIFX Risk / Return Rank: 74
TTIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TTIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
TTIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
TTIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TTIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRDBX	TTIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.32	+0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	1.85	+1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.33	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	1.91	+3.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.62	7.93	+8.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the TTIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDBX and TTIFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRDBX	TTIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	1.32	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.48	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.51	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between CRDBX and TTIFX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Dividend Comparison

CRDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.08%, more than TTIFX's 3.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund	15.08%	15.36%	12.58%	9.91%	0.18%	25.05%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund	3.00%	3.01%	0.00%	5.33%	0.84%	2.02%	4.71%	1.09%	0.00%	0.94%

Drawdowns

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDBX drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than TTIFX's maximum drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDBX and TTIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRDBX	TTIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.00%	-13.21%	-83.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-2.66%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.00%	-9.04%	-87.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.71%	-1.73%	-93.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-2.15%	-23.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	0.64%	+1.58%

Volatility

CRDBX vs. TTIFX - Volatility Comparison

Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) at 1.12%. This indicates that CRDBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRDBX	TTIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	1.12%	+4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	1.84%	+8.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.01%	4.40%	+16.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,635.86%	5.91%	+1,629.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,525.82%	5.93%	+1,519.89%