CRDBX vs. TFAQX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CRDBX (Potomac Defensive Bull Fund) and TFAQX (TFA Quantitative Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, CRDBX returned 15.90%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for TFAQX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRDBX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for TFAQX.

Performance

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDBX achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly higher than TFAQX's 10.01% return.

CRDBX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 19.84%
• 6M: 18.05%
• 1Y: 43.85%
• 3Y*: 20.23%
• 5Y*: 15.90%
• 10Y*: —

TFAQX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 25.61%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund	19.84%	25.36%	19.91%	18.44%	-8.21%	28.08%	24.03%
TFAQX TFA Quantitative Fund	10.01%	11.41%	22.12%	23.25%	-25.11%	10.88%	17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDBX and TFAQX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020	0.60

The correlation between CRDBX and TFAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRDBX vs. TFAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDBX

CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

TFAQX

TFAQX Risk / Return Rank: 36
TFAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
TFAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
TFAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
TFAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TFAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRDBX	TFAQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	1.68	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	2.22	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.30	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.18	2.12	+4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.03	7.17	+12.85

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the TFAQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDBX and TFAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDBX drawdown since its inception was -28.12%, roughly equal to the maximum TFAQX drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDBX and TFAQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRDBX	TFAQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.12%	-27.78%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-12.85%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.77%	-21.59%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.12%	-27.78%	-0.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-0.48%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.53%	-8.43%	+1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	3.78%	-1.58%

Volatility

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) is 6.06%, while TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that CRDBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRDBX	TFAQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	7.02%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	12.59%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.28%	16.23%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.88%	17.62%	+2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.40%	17.43%	+2.97%

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDBX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TFAQX's 1.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRDBX vs. TFAQX - Dividend Comparison

CRDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.82%, more than TFAQX's 9.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund	12.82%	15.36%	12.58%	9.91%	0.18%	25.05%	1.65%
TFAQX TFA Quantitative Fund	9.23%	10.16%	0.00%	0.03%	5.06%	20.52%	4.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRDBX and TFAQX in my portfolio?

CRDBX and TFAQX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRDBX or TFAQX?

TFAQX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to CRDBX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDBX dropped -28.12% vs TFAQX's -27.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.